-
Website
http://www.heroestheseries.com/ -
Original page
http://www.heroestheseries.com/should-heroes-set-an-end-date/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
-
Heroes 4.12 The Fifth Stage Discussion Thread
1 week ago · 106 comments
-
Open Thread: First Half of Heroes Season 4
1 day ago · 6 comments
-
Heroes 4.11 Thanksgiving Discussion Thread
2 weeks ago · 38 comments
-
Heroes 4.11 Thanksgiving Promo Images and Video
3 weeks ago · 56 comments
-
Heroes Preview: 4.12 The Fifth Stage
2 weeks ago · 28 comments
-
Heroes 4.12 The Fifth Stage Discussion Thread
I watch Lost and I have to say that although I would never want it to end, it will after next series and ABC have made a wise decision announcing this.
Now all the remaining episodes will be full of finishing story lines and action to try and bring everything to a close, which will give the show the justice it deserves. All viewers will hate to see ii end, but it will finish on a high note. If they had continued then the show would fall apart.
^(Sorry abut Lost talk but it is relevant).^
Heroes is beginning to go that way and if NBC release an end date of after next season or 2 whatever, the show will be concluded in a way that should give it justice just like how amazing it was in season 1.
I say 2 more seasons max then finish it.
(1) Scarcity does NOT increase demand, unless we're talking comic books or the like. The demand increase will continue to be based on rumblings of excellent writing and delivery.
(2) The idea that it "helped" the other 3 programs is anecdotal and not and example of evidence-based fact. Also, I don't think that this factor was isolated from other factors to have been determined the cause of show success (did the writing get better, etc.?).
(3) Improved ratings? Excellent writing and execution will, not an "end date." See (1).
(4) I don't see it. I think with Fuller back on the scene, the buzz will pick back up and the end of this season, if not season 4 will see an upswing.
(5) "Death with Dignity"? What would be the point? Silly and superfluous.
All in all, Bryan Fuller...the writing driving force behind the success of season 1, has only barely had his presence felt via his presence in the writing room with last night's episode. His first writer's credit episode is not even airing for 2 weeks, and this knucklehead blogger wants to call for such a thing without giving this reinvigoration a chance to come to fruition? Sophomoric, premature and reactionary, at best, this idea is.
They should go up to season 5 and start writing an arc that will lead to that finale. They would have two full seasons to tell an amazing story.
If the show become too successful in it's final days, just make a spin-off. But still end the current series.
Besides if a show as epic as hereos sets an end date you can bet it will end in such a way that it would be absurd to continue and wouldnt make sense if they did. Sounds like a trap set by people who dont want heroes to go on running. Setting an end date would be a terrible idea and suck for hardcore fans.
Besides it would mean the future is not as I have painted it. Heroes must reach at least 7 seasons and hopefully will go beyond that. I will be most disapointed if the end at 5 as I believe this end date will try to force them too do.
I don't know about setting an end date
I would guess a lot of people want to see a show down with Peter and Sylar.
I much rather there be a superpowerful bad guy that takes all the heroes to stop. A good ending may be after all the heroes do there part to save the world Sylar and Peter square off. Sylar or Peter could say, "I always wanted to know who is strongest" and then they go at it in the desert where they can really cut loose. It might be costly but they should show both of them using every ability they can from mind contol to flight.
That would be one hell of a ending
commit on that !!! (sorry for bad spell or gar)
Just let Heroes take a pause and let the writers come with a script that they can compare with the 1st season.
We love it overhere in The Netherlands and we don't want to see Heroes come to an end yet.
-pause it and then come back with a storyline very rigulous
-take the special effects money and bring it to the writers....there were very good movies in the past withouth so big effect.
anyway hereos rulles here in Romania, also in europe.(plese promote on other countries ass well).
All the decreasing ratings are made only in the US.
Give it a TV/comic book/Cliff hanger perspective.
For this season and next they can bring all the characters together to save the world one more time. Keep the stories going because characters can evolve and grow. Look at how the Star Trek franchise has grown. Yet all different shows have their own little personality, because of the characters. It may end but they can bring it back.
Another idea is to make it a little bit more smaller scale. Kind of like how CSI does it. There can be a band of heroes in different parts of the world or USA. They can be small teams or individuals all trying to save the world, the nation, the city from evil because evil lurks everywhere.
It might be a stretch to see comic book writers script TV shows but when it comes to heroes, I totally see it happening. Either they can show the hero come into contact with another person to deal with their powers. Pushing the individual to either become a hero or a nemesis.
Then there is always the perspective of how us normal citizens deal with a friend, neighbor, co-worker, classmate when they have a power. Do we help them, take advantage, turn them in?
The show can have an ending but I can see at the end of it spawning from the end different spin off of Heroes. The broad view from California, Japan, New York and D.C. is a little too hard to swallow. I always wondered how HRG got home in time to eat dinner when he was dealing with a person in NY. Even this season when Americans raided Hiro's hideout in Japan and brought them back to USA, how did that work? Heroes has a large scale view and I think it can be scaled down a bit. So, end it and rebuild and create a team or focus on one or two heroes.
I can see Hiro having his own show called something like "Heroes: Japan". hehehehehehehehehehehehehe
season 3 eps-20 was aamzing and kills me to know wht happens next.
the show should never end but have a great story which doesn't make us hate it
thanks
can't wait march 16 2009 for next show
I like your idea of turning them into something like CSI style. And timbernett makes a good point about marvel dc comics coming into play. It seems right now, they need another player. Heroes has the potential of becoming a show that doesn't necessarily need an end date, but rather a more structured way of airing successful seasons with good stories that interlink them.
ww w.villainsview.blogspot.com ww w.thevaultofheroes.blogspot.com
coming of the new president and making us believe that the bad men(like Danko which is one of the best characters of the show) are responsible for recent problems of the country and the world and good men(the heroes) are going to keep them away and send them out of being in charge and closing of guantanamo and ...
I think the art and the artists are the one who draws a wide new view for the society and people not the political men and goveners .think about it!
If it drags on horribly, it'll just make everything worse.
But I don't think Heroes is all that doomed. I mean, the ratings have slipped quite a bit, but if we rouse enough activity, then it might get those who have "lost faith" in heroes.
I also believe that such a strategy also puts unnecessary pressure on the writing staff to come up with some fancy grandiose conclusion. Apparently, there's already enough on their plate with the fight against declining ratings and the desire to regain the "fresh and shiny" look of Season 1.
Contrary to the article, reneging is not an option. If Heroes does decide to go out with a decided bang, it does not need to come back. It's a decision that has to be made with a backbone. If nothing else, it's kind of a betrayal to have a climactic grand finale and then ASSUME the hardcore fans will come back and sit through the aftermath of what was supposed to be the end-all-be-all conclusion. Such a move would be nothing short of foul play.
However, I DO believe that the show should switch back to Kring's original idea of a rotating cast, giving the current set another season or two and then slowly putting them all on buses or killing them off for real. ie: Peter and Sylar die for real (in an epic clash of course); Hiro goes back to running Yamagato, effectively sitting on the sidelines, etc etc,---All to give way for some fresh blood in fresh locations.
In regards to the argument at hand, the show should go on for as long as it needs to and not feel confined by a deadline that may or may not be necessary as the years go on.
I'm not expecting the show to become a Doctor Who or even the Simpsons (both being famous long-runners), but I do think that the most dignified end for the show would not be to kill it in its prime, but to let it come to its organic conclusion. I believe THAT is the way the show should lean on its hardcore audience.
As for ratings, I think this show is way too sensitive towards them. Everybody knows the Nielsen ratings aren't adequately adjusted to consider the new media that people are using to watch television these days (DVR, internet, cell phones, etc).
I think this show's worse enemy is not the ratings, but rather the pervading sense of insecurity surrounding it. There are shows out there that are far worse off than Heroes even WITH the ratings slump.
Just saying.
Rant out.
If Heroes ends anytime soon I will be pissed, it sucks that the ratings are bad but It is my favorite TV show. All the other junk on TV should be shut down, in fact they(NBC) should just stop broadcasting if they cancel Heroes because it is the only good thing on their channel in my opinion.
IM taking the show and its writers to england just as soon as i get enough money.
heroes is great and yes some of the time they have had long drawn out story lines but there is so much potentional in this series
ok so viewers are falling so why dont NBC make a simple advert for tv the3 advert should recap a bit on the past then the presant then hint at the future with something gripping
should there be an end date NO the series has never had chance to boom yet it had allot to deal with the strike and everything
come one NBC get ya finger out your a**e and get people interested again
im so mad right now i could just grab sylar and shake him saying teach NBC a lesson as im your real Father the man you just met was mearly an illusion i created where else do you think parkman got his ability from remember i tiold you i absorb others powers
PPS Hiro & ando need bigger parts they are the comedy duo and Hiro needs his powers back soon
sorry rant over :D
Heroes isn't doomed (anyway) - don't worry about that statement, it is ridiculous.
I think that Heroes should NOT set an official end date, however I think that they should get an ending in mind. That way it will still be a satisfying end to the series, whenever that will be, but they won't have backed themselves into a corner about HAVING to end the show then. This way they can take as long as they want before reaching that ending, but still have a satisfying ending.
what they should do is end the show on the " Day the Earth Ends"
which is sum time 2012.
be hella tight.
It's like every single television viewer completely forgot about the writers strike.
Maybe that is why the season didn't fan out as planned and there were half the amount of episodes that there should have been.
People need to stop complaining about season three being not so great because season two was not as good as one.
USE YOUR BRAINS: no writers = disruption of a successful project.
Let me start by saying that I consider "5" the magic number when it comes to TV series. Though I would prefer 7seasons. Anything less than 5 means its an average show. Like most things there are exceptions to the rule = Battlestar Galatica(Re imagined series) at 4 was a hit!!
At less than 5seasons means
-A. Something stopped the show like Bad writing ,Bad acting, Actors cause trouble and leave, or (forbid) a death in the cast. Ex: John Ritter. (Who had a promising series and was canceled the next season) My wife Cried :(
Or B. The writing and acting is GREAT!!!. However the show is based in such a far-out concept that the show never connects to the audience.
Set seasons aren't a bad thing. look at babylon 5. The writer JMS had the entire story planned over 5seasons before filming started. A wonderful series. A previous commenter said that if Heroes ended with great rating that a spinoff could occur. Spin-offs aren't usually a good thing. FLO spunoff from Mel's diner, The Ropers spunoff from "Threes Co." Which ironically spawned another spinoof "Three's a crowd" with only lasted one season "I think". Also Friends spunoff "joey". Right back to Babylon 5 which spunoff "Crusade"= 1 season. As before "exceptions to the rule" Frasier spunoff from "cheers" and ran for years. Both Ran for 11 seasons each. Some would say Frasier was better. At the same time you don't want to drag it out. I used to read comics quite a bit and was thrilled to hear about Smallville.been watching since the begining. Its finishing up its 8th. I heard rumors that a 9th was being pushed for. I hope not. This last season is great, but enough is enough. Tom Welling's character has been practically played out. A lot of Cast has left and time to end it with a bang.
I'd push for a fifth. Examine the Rating and characters at the end of the fourth. It doens't look promising for the show. Then fight like hell and get a fifth and sixth to corral all the storylines and wrap it up. I'd prefer 7seasons at least though :).. IMO.
a quick-and-easy online purchasing, Shop now!!
a quick-and-easy online purchasing, Shop now!!
I think Heroes is being given a hard time at the moment by bloggers and people who fancy themselves critics but an end date is absurd. Firstly I think the problem with the show was the mess up of season two. The story planned for season two didn't happen because of the strike then the beginning of season three felt like a 'where do we go search' because there was no proper rounding to the previous arc. With Fuller back on the show I think it should be given a chance to redeem its former glory next season. While this year's series wasn't riveting I still think it was much better than most other tv shows on at the moment and there is so much more that could be explored with the large ensemble cast that I refuse to give up on the show. I'm loving the return of Mica as the rebel.
Anyone who thinks that tv shows go out better when they know it's coming is only right to the point that they get to round off some storylines better but the show DIES I'd rather not see heroes die. If garbage like One Tree Hill can survive for 7 years Heroes deserves at least 20!!!!
Life doesn't end with a big plan. It dies spontaneously and without warning. Tv should be the same. Wrapping it up in a nice neat package so that it can be put on a shelf and forgotten about is stupid. Buffy never truly ended after the 7th season because of the Slayers' awakening and I loved that even if the show was gone, I could imagine all the wonderful stories/possibilities with that many super-charged women. (Then the comics came but that's besides the point)